I’ve Found A Copyright Infringement! Now What?

organic blueberries

Blueberries – apparently infringers love Blueberries

If you’ve been searching for your images on the internet and have found copyright infringements – what do you do next?

   For many photographers finding our photographs on the internet in places we did not intend for them to appear can be frustrating. I have written this post as a follow up to my earlier post “Finding Copyright Infringements on the Web“. My previous post illustrated one method for finding your images in use on the internet, while this post tries to cover some of the options for what you can do next. I of course should point out that I am not a lawyer, but many cases of infringement are below the threshold for when we may get lawyers involved.

   Your first step should be to first verify that this is actually an infringement. If you have never sold an image license, uploaded to any agencies or even told people they can use an image then this probably isn’t a concern. If you have, however, double checking your licenses beforehand can save potential embarrassment later on.

   There really isn’t a “one size fits all” answer for what to do once you have discovered a copyright infringement. What you choose to do is up to you, and people may see some forms of infringement as no big deal, while others will not. Those sharing their images with a Creative Commons license such as “Attribution Non-Commercial” probably will not care if one of their photographs shows up on a non commercial blog. Some photographers who share their “All Rights Reserved” images will not want their images shared without permission or license in any location other than their own sites. What you are able to do also changes depending on the copyright laws in the part of the world where the infringement occurred. So I can’t tell you what you should do specifically, but I’ll outline a few potential responses that may fit your situation.

The Easy Method – Do Nothing

   While ignoring an infringement is easy, I rarely do so anymore if the infringer is based in a country that takes such matters seriously. I may not always get to one of the reactions below immediately (especially for personal non-commercial use infringements), but everything I find goes on a list I work through eventually.

The Removal Request for Non-Commercial Personal Uses

   This is an option I only reserve for personal, non-commercial infringements. In a perfect world this kind of request would be met with a positive response and honoured. In my experience, however, most friendly requests for image removal are ignored. Very few actually respond by removing the image, or perhaps giving image credit if that was requested (which I only do on very rare occasions). The remainder respond with the sort of vitriol I won’t repeat here – but you can use your imagination. Whatever the form of non compliance, this means I have to write another email to their web host, or issue a DMCA takedown notice – which takes even more of my time. For this reason, in instances where I am not pursuing payment, I go straight to the DMCA notice – or email the webhost/social media site directly. I would rather communicate with people in a friendly manner, potentially even educating them about image usage… but it just has not been worth it in the majority of times I have tried it.

The Payment Request

   I always request payment from uses of my images that are even vaguely commercial. I sometimes handle this on my own, but usually contact a lawyer. My usual first contact is fairly gentle. I explain that there must have been some sort of mistake as I have no record of a license for the image use. I then outline that they are infringing on my copyright and give them a price for a retroactive license. If paid, this only give them a license up to the current date. If they want to use the image going forward I point out a new license can be negotiated. Some times this “gentle reminder” goes ignored, but often it is successful and most communications I have had with reputable companies have been fairly civil. Those who ignore my initial letter receive a follow up with much sterner (but still professional) language. Often those who ignored the first letter respond to the second.

The Lawyer

   I pursue the majority of non personal usage of my photography via lawyers in various countries. If you want to approach a lawyer in order to take a look at an infringement you have found, do be sure that copyright is part of their practice – they are the experts.

The DMCA Notice

   The DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act of 1998) protects online service providers (website hosts, Social Media companies etc) in the United States from liability for the content their users upload. When a complaint is made under the DMCA the service provider usually disables the content in question quickly so as to not become liable themselves. What this means for us is if your infringed photograph is on a US based webhost then having the material removed can be relatively easy. If you decide to go after most image infringements a lot of the DMCA notices you may issue will be on social media sites. Rather than writing an email and finding an appropriate recipient for it – many of these companies have a form to fill out that is much quicker and easier. I’ve included a few links to notable services below and their DCMA/Copyright Complaint forms.

Pinterest: https://about.pinterest.com/en/copyright
Instagram: https://help.instagram.com/contact/552695131608132
Tumblr: https://www.tumblr.com/dmca
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/help/contact/208282075858952
Twitter: https://support.twitter.com/forms/dmca
Google: http://support.google.com/legal/troubleshooter/1114905?hl=en
WordPress.com: http://automattic.com/dmca-notice/

For most web hosts you can find the DMCA agent (who to contact) on their website, in their terms of service document, and occasionally in their support section. Individual services may also outline the exact language they require in a DMCA notice. While these things are pretty standard, sometimes a web host will require an address and phone number, which is information I tend not to give out unless it is necessary.

The US Copyright website also has a list of DMCA Agents that may come in handy for some web hosts: http://www.copyright.gov/onlinesp/list/a_agents.html.

How do I write a DMCA notice and who do I send it to?

   A DMCA notice requires some specific “legalese” to be valid. The article “Two Easy Steps for Using the DMCA Takedown Notice to Battle Copyright Infringement” on the NPPA website explains both how to write a DMCA notice and how to determine where to send it. Written by a lawyer too. I did point out before that I’m not a lawyer right?

   While this article outlines a way to find a website’s host via IP I have found the initial method of a simple whois search to be fruitful at least half the time. The nameservers for a website domain name are often something like ns1.websitehostname.com and this makes determining who to contact rather easy in many circumstances.

   Generally speaking most of these notices are acted on within a week. Some may take longer depending on how busy they are but I have also had takedown notices work in the same day I sent the notice. Do be aware that the sort of person that would have given me a nasty email (see “The Removal Request” section above) occasionally responds in the same manner with a DMCA request. At that point, however, you can pretty much ignore them – the image is no longer on their site. In one case this did mean that suddenly a LOT of my images were suddenly on their site. Another email solved that, and their site never resurfaced online again that I have noticed. They were likely asked to find new hosting.

The Copyright Enforcement Service

   Copyright Enforcement Services such as Imagerights, Pixsy, etc can be useful for pursuing infringements in various parts of the world. I’ve had some success with them, but largely I have found that they are expensive and do not get near the results a copyright lawyer is likely to. In some instances I could have probably done a lot better contacting the infringing party myself. That said, sometimes they are able to pursue something in a jurisdiction outside of North America where I do not currently know of a lawyer to contact, so using them in those instances is worth a try for me.

Final Thoughts

   Ultimately this can be a full time job depending on how many images you are finding without licensing or permission. Often just looking through your images with a reverse image search can take a lot of time. Writing a DMCA notice does not take a lot of time, but can take up an afternoon if you are sending as many as I do on occasion. Sometimes I put the less egregious instances off for a while, but I do think it is important to take copyright issues with your work seriously. If you do not look into these issues at all – you may find an infringement that does get you angry eventually. At that point you may find that your image has been all over the internet for several years, and having all those images removed that late in the game can be difficult or even impossible. I stay on top of this so none of my images get away from me in that manner, though a few still have.

Good luck! If you have any questions or comments feel free to leave me a comment below.

11 thoughts on “I’ve Found A Copyright Infringement! Now What?”

  1. Excellent post – we find particular frustration with twitter – whereby a user downloads images, and re-uploads as a tweet wihout credit or linkback ( as would automatically occur with a formal retweet)

    Not a commercial issue, but very personal, annoying and frustrating, particularly given the vitriolic responses one receives.

    Just wondered about your thoughts on such ๐Ÿ™‚

    Once again, great read – and thank you


  2. Thanks Kevin. Infringements on twitter I would treat like anywhere else. If they are commercial I would try to get money for them. If non commercial I would issue a DMCA notice to twitter itself to deal with the image. Twitter has it’s own copyright form like many other services here:


    I’ll add that link to my post, seems I missed it the first time!

  3. Good post, thanks. I have recently begun pursuing copyright infringements and have probably doubled my income as a result! It can be a bit time consuming, but the payments are worth devoting some time each week to it.

    I was particularly interested in your ImageRights experience. I am sure we would all be keen to hear more about how that goes.

    One thing that riles me: the apparent requirement to register images with the US Copyright Office. This for me would be a *massive* bureaucratic undertaking. Did ImageRights require you to have done it? Do you do it anyway?

    People might find this series of articles enormously useful, with template letters at the end that the writer allows you to adapt as necessary. I recommend it:
    http:// http://www.epuk.org/Opinion/994/stolen-photographs-what-to-do


    • Thanks Gary – glad you got something out of this post. Imagerights did not require me to register with the USCO, though they did encourage it. As they offer 3 registrations per year with their service (I signed up for a year) I have now done 2 of the 3 registrations. It was a big pain in the butt to get publication dates for all of my 2012, and 2013 published images (750 photographs) but ultimately worth it. Going forward every time I publish an image I make note of the date and save a small copy of the image – and this will make the process for my next registration pretty easy. As a UK based photographer though, this registration mostly likely will have the most importance for US based infringements. It does make a big difference for US based infringements though – the penalties available at that point are dramatically higher should things progress with lawyers.

      The link you provided with template letters is one I’ve seen before. I was purposely vague in my post as to what exactly one can do as this varies greatly with the laws of individual countries. One template may be great in one country but not be completely relevant in others. I have used the templates there and in other locations guide the writing of my own letters, substituting the relevant copyright law information as appropriate. I do think it is important for photographers to protect their copyrights so I am glad to hear you are another photographer that does so as well. ๐Ÿ™‚

  4. Yes, I should have made clear that was UK advice – although in fact the principles are the same. I think it is very important always to be calm, succinct and professional as the PTS ( thieving parasitic scum :)) squirm and yell and call you names. Your tone can be important down the line.

    You observe that USCO >>registration mostly likely will have the most importance for US based infringements. … the penalties available at that point are dramatically higher should things progress with lawyers.<< Precisely!


    • That site is handy, and I have it in my bookmarks toolbar but it also comes up with the wrong host on many occasions. I did not include it for that reason, though it is one of my frequently used tools. I use the suggestion it makes as a place to start (along with the nameservers in use on the domain, and sometimes the IP).


Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: